- Posts: 27
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The 53Axxxx went from dry to wet clutches at s/n 53A1907. The outer wet drum 8H2401 seems to be unique to the 977. The only source I could find is www.machinerytrader.com/parts/search?pag...archtype=starts-with
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The 53Axxxx went from dry to wet clutches at s/n 53A1907. The outer wet drum 8H2401 seems to be unique to the 977. The only source I could find is www.machinerytrader.com/parts/search?pag...archtype=starts-with
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Hi Team,
a similar sized machine that came out in 1963 with wet S/C's and Brakes was the D6C.
From experience as a general rule of thumb, originally the track loaders were beefed up versions of an equivalent sized Track Type Tractors--basically a 977 was a d6 with bucket linkage etc, and D7 undercarriage.
BUT, the Numerical Parts Record would show any similar used parts for both machines, just as you indicate but without success.
At some time I recall that on some machines (D4--955 for sure) there was a change to the inner steer. clutch drums to go from multi toothed steels to ,I think 4 or 6 teeth splines where the drum splines were tapered to allow a gradual take up of load and so help reduce shock loadings to the drive train.
Just some random thoughts.
Cheers,
Eddie B.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Antique Caterpillar Machinery Owners Club
P.O. Box 9301
Peoria, IL 61612
(309) 691-5002
cat@acmoc.org
"I became a member recently because the wealth of knowledge here is priceless."
- Chris R
"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
- Jason N